Early in February and then in the palace Cipanas, president of Indonesia handed MEDIUM-TERM DEVELOPMENT PLAN NATIONAL (RPJMN) phase II in 2010 until 2014 to the ministers and governors. In the RPJMN in target economic growth could reach 7% in the year 2013 and 2014. Unemployment and poverty can also be minimized in number to 8 - 10% and 5 - 6% in the year 2014 amounts to come.
If the target is achieved will certainly be an achievement for periods father was president of Indonesia, and what if the government can suppress and minimize the amount of poverty in our society until 8 to 10 percent say it could beat the poverty level in the new order (the led by Mr. soeharto) because in 1996 the poverty rate only reached 11% only.
If we want to look at RPJMN the previous year ie in 2005 until 2009, the estimated poverty rate in 2009 of 8.2% we can only doubt the target can be achieved. Since the year 2009 level of poverty in our society is still above the number 14.15% of the population already in the survey (which can be and we believe the poverty rate is still very large numbers in the list, could be truthful above 50% of Indonesia's population) that fact. And according to the government that was down slightly from 15.97% in 2005 whereas in 2009 to 14.15%.
Doubt was higher in 2010 due to this central body of statistical estimates of poverty rates will not be much different from last year. This is in line with the prediction that mention LIPI poverty level in 2010 reached the figure of 14% (but the authors estimate the actual number is greater than the researchers suwasta or government, and I'm sure the top 48 percent of Indonesia's population) because if the estimated number of digits poverty communities only 14% there will not be possible at this time many children unemployment, street buskers and similar to it.
200,000 the number of poverty in Indonesia, according to the researchers, but it is not the actual amount, if the researchers could really honest and open their eyes wide open so they could see the amount of poverty in society is more than the already have a good standard of living. I think the government and the experts are too quick to calculate the amount of poverty in the State of Indonesia.
ACUTE POVERTY.
These facts show how low the effectiveness of poverty reduction programs that have been run by the government. Even if not exaggerated in saying that the current development go hand in hand with a number of processes that are increasing poverty. And all this in the midst of acute poverty conditions, or has reached a critical stage and prone to many people who could have experienced the death because they can not provide for a minimum for food supply to their bodies.
The government stuck with the three concepts for poverty eradication
FIRST CONCEPT:
HELP FOR POOR PEOPLE AT ALL THAT CAN NOT MEET BASIC NEEDS (if we are honest with conditions like this are still in the theoretical stage, because there are very many who can not eat our society, that is the truth).
SECOND CONCEPT:
HOLD THE GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM (PNPM) which is to meet the needs of decent living or infrastructure and business development (for this second case the government is already helping the community often, but because our society is still much that is not a good virtuous character is often time that government assistance in the use for which no proper kepentringan, and the government expected to take stern action against the perpetrators of their own government or the perpetrators of the community to act decisively. Honesty is missing in Indonesia is probably yes).
THIRD CONCEPT:
HOLD GOVERNMENT CAPITAL BUSINESS LOAN PROGRAM FOR PEOPLE or commonly called by the people KUR koprasi units, the government's intention that people do not live in the poverty line. but I think this program is not very helpful at all, because our society is not need a loan but needed help freely without any requirement for capital assistance, and the government is also expected to oversee the firm and wise there and do not take government employees virtuous character that is not good to watch or distribute such aid (real examples in the State of China, Japan and some European countries).
As we already know, to help our community out of poverty, we and the government should be able to work together and copy the trust to be able to maintain standard of living and improve our economy was minimal in the basic needs of people in earning his living.
If we expect a good standard of living and proper for us and society, should we all can adapt to our lifestyle of each, with the way the government could first provide concrete examples in being honest and fair in work and in carrying out this mandate. How could living standards will be in reach if the moral and personality of people - those who govern the society that includes the perpetrators of such criminal god of goodness?
Hopefully our current government could be more assertive in taking actions against the perpetrators can not be responsible. If you see the fate of Indonesia is currently the writer missed the zakat program taught by the prophet Muhammad to Muslims, because charity is not only good for the people of Islamic religion, but also very useful for the people of other religions, because Islam came as a religion and the teachings that can bring peace to all mankind, and NO DEFECTS AND LESS least, PLEASE CORRECT YOU ALL, THERE ARE ECONOMIC LAW AND THE LAW humanitarian welfare standard BETTER LIFE OF LEGAL ZAKAT ????? IF YOU FIND PLEASE CONTACT THE WRITER OF THIS. THE AUTHOR AND 100 PERCENT SURE YOU MAY NOT BE THERE, HOWEVER AS A HUMAN-MADE LAW WILL NEVER could beat THE CREATOR OF LAW MADE EVERYTHING.
Hopefully we can become the servants who could be useful for themselves, their families, relatives, friends and the general public ... ..
0 comments:
Post a Comment